White House Threatens Sharp Cuts in US Workforce Amid Shutdown Standoff

Advanced | October 3, 2025

✨ 혼자서 기사를 소리 내어 읽거나 튜터를 따라 각 단락을 반복해서 읽으세요. 레벨...

OMB Memo: Agencies Told to Prep for Cuts

The Memo Issued on September 25

On September 25, 2025, the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued a memo instructing federal agencies to prepare reduction‑in‑force (RIF) plans ahead of a possible government shutdown. Even programs with no discretionary funding were flagged if they didn’t align with presidential priorities. This directive was seen as part of broader planning around US workforce cuts. (Reuters)

Permanent Cuts vs. Furloughs

The memo told agencies to identify which projects might see permanent staffing cuts—not just furloughs—and to submit proposed layoff plans. This reinforced the possibility of significant US workforce cuts. (Reuters)

What the Threat Means for Federal Workers

Temporary Furloughs vs. Permanent Cuts

Typically, nonessential staff are furloughed (temporarily sent home without pay) during shutdowns, then rehired when funding is restored. But this time, the Trump administration is considering permanent job cuts, not just temporary idling. This marks a dramatic shift in how US workforce cuts might be applied. (PBS)

Employee Departures

정보 154,000 employees are already set to depart via buyouts by September 30, the end of the fiscal year. (Reuters)

Political Reactions

Democratic leaders quickly condemned the strategy. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called it “intimidation,” accusing the administration of using federal workers as political pawns. (Reuters) House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries echoed that sentiment. (CBS News)

Economic Ripples and Legal Questions

Economic Impact

If large‑scale layoffs occur, the economic impact could be significant. With many workers suddenly unemployed, consumer spending and local economies may feel the strain. Also, suspension of key data releases is possible: the Labor Department may pause its September employment report amid the standoff. (Investing.com)

Legal Uncertainty

Legal experts question whether these cuts can be carried out under existing law. Mass firings during a shutdown—especially permanent ones—are unprecedented. (Washington Post)

How Businesses Should Watch This

Contract and Grant Exposure

Businesses with contracts or dependencies on federal agencies should stay alert. Projects or grants tied to discretionary funding may face sudden cancelation or staffing changes. Corporate risk teams might reexamine exposure to regulatory or contracting disruptions.

Market Reaction

Also, markets may respond to uncertainty: federal layoffs, halted spending, or economic weakening can shift investor sentiment.

Vocabulary

Reduction‑in‑force (RIF) (noun) – a formal process of cutting positions or laying off employees
E.g.: “The memo instructed agencies to prepare RIF plans.”
Furlough (noun/verb) – temporary leave without pay
E.g.: “Many nonessential workers would be furloughed during a shutdown.”
Discretionary funding (noun) – budget money that Congress allocates yearly, not guaranteed
E.g.: “Programs without discretionary funding are at higher risk of cuts.”
Align (verb) – to match or be consistent with something
E.g.: “Programs must align with presidential priorities to avoid cuts.”
Depart (verb) – to leave (a job, place, etc.)
E.g.: “154,000 employees are set to depart via buyouts.”
Condemned (verb) – strongly criticized
E.g.: “Democrats condemned the memo as intimidation.”
Pawns (noun) – people used by others for their own purpose
E.g.: “Workers are being used as political pawns in the standoff.”
Ripples (noun) – smaller effects extending outward
E.g.: “Layoffs may create economic ripples.”
Suspension (noun) – temporary stopping
E.g.: “The Labor Department may suspend data releases.”
Exposure (noun) – risk or susceptibility to harm
E.g.: “Businesses should check their exposure to federal funding changes.”

Discussion Questions (About the Article)

Why is the administration shifting from furloughs to potential permanent layoffs?
What are the arguments for and against using mass firings during a shutdown?
How might this threat affect morale and retention among federal employees?
What legal constraints could limit permanent cuts during a shutdown?
From a business view, how would you adjust if your company relies on federal contracts?

Discussion Questions (About the Topic)

Should governments use workers as leverage in funding disputes? Why or why not?
What protections should federal employees have in shutdowns?
How does political brinkmanship affect operational continuity in government?
What are the broader economic risks of mass federal layoffs?
How can companies factor political risk into their strategic planning?

Related Idiom

“Drawing a line in the sand” – setting a point that must not be crossed.
How it applies: Democrats and Republicans are drawing a line in the sand: each side signals there’s a boundary they won’t concede.

📢 Want more tips like this? 👉 Sign up for the All About English Mastery Newsletter! Click here to join us!

Want to finally master English but don’t have the time? Mastering English for Busy Professionals is the course for you! Check it out now!

Follow our YouTube Channel @All_About_English for more great insights and tips.

This article was inspired by Reuters: “White House threatens sharp cuts in US workforce in shutdown standoff.” (Reuters)