China’s Condom Tax Sparks Skepticism and Health Worries

Advanced | December 19, 2025

✨ 혼자서 기사를 소리 내어 읽거나 튜터를 따라 각 단락을 반복해서 읽으세요. 레벨...

China condom tax: What changed and when?

A policy shift buried in a tax law

China is preparing to add a 13% value-added tax (VAT) to many contraceptive drugs and products — including condoms — starting January 1, 2026. The change comes from China’s updated VAT law, which removes contraceptives from the tax-exempt list after more than three decades. (Yahoo News, AP News)

Why it’s happening now

For years, China promoted inexpensive contraception during the one-child policy era. Now the country is trying to raise birth rates — and this China condom tax has been interpreted by many people as part of a broader shift from “population control” to “fertility promotion.” But the public reaction has been… skeptical. (Time)

Why people are mocking it online

“If you can’t afford a condom…”

The policy wasn’t heavily promoted by state media, but it quickly started trending on Chinese social media — often with sarcasm. Some comments basically boiled down to: Raising a child costs far more than paying a little extra for contraception, so how would a tax change anyone’s decision? (AP News)

The bigger issue: the cost of family life

That mockery points to a real economic pressure: many young adults say housing costs, education expenses, and job insecurity matter far more than minor price changes. In other words, people aren’t avoiding children because condoms are cheap — they’re avoiding children because life is expensive.

What health experts worry about

Access and unintended consequences

Public health experts warn that if condoms and other contraceptives become more expensive, some people — especially lower-income consumers — may use them less. That could increase unintended pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and even longer-term medical costs. Demographer Qian Cai (University of Virginia) said the tax is unlikely to raise fertility, because the cost of raising a child is still dramatically higher than a 13% VAT on contraceptives. (AP News)

Abortion and STI data adds context

China’s public-health context matters here. AP reported that China’s National Health Commission estimated 9–10 million abortions annually during 2014–2021, and China stopped publishing abortion data in 2022. AP also cited official disease-control data showing over 100,000 gonorrhea cases and about 670,000 syphilis cases in 2024, plus about 1.4 million people living with HIV/AIDS in 2024 — with infections rising notably among older adults. (AP News)

A gender angle many people can’t ignore

Birth control responsibility falls heavily on women

In China, the burden of contraception often falls on women. AP cited 2022 research supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation reporting that only 9% of couples rely on condoms, while 44.2% use IUDs, 30.5% use female sterilization, and 4.7% use male sterilization. That’s part of why some women view policy signals about reproduction as intrusive — not just “economic policy.” (AP News)

“This feels like control, not support”

AP also reported criticism from women who feel the government is still trying to steer private choices — just in the opposite direction from the one-child era. Even if the tax is framed as a technical adjustment, the timing makes it feel political to many people.

So will it boost birth rates?

Probably not — but it could raise risks

Some researchers argue this China condom tax won’t meaningfully change fertility decisions. Another expert, Yi Fuxian (University of Wisconsin–Madison), told AP the move is “logical” in the sense that contraceptives are being treated like ordinary goods again — but that doesn’t mean it will increase births. The main risk is that it nudges behavior in a way that increases health problems, even if only at the margins. (AP News, ABC News Australia)

In business terms: it’s a policy with a clear intent, but uncertain outcomes — and the downside risks could be real.

Vocabulary

Value-added tax (VAT) (noun) – a consumption tax added at each stage of production and sale.
Example: China will apply a 13% VAT to condoms starting in 2026.
Exemption (noun) – a special rule that removes something from a requirement or tax.
Example: Contraceptives previously had a VAT exemption.
Skepticism (noun) – doubt about whether something makes sense or will work.
Example: The announcement was met with skepticism online.
Unintended (adjective) – not planned or expected.
Example: Experts worry about unintended pregnancies.
Contraceptive (noun/adjective) – a product or method used to prevent pregnancy.
Example: Condoms are a common contraceptive method.
Public health (noun) – the health of a population and the systems that protect it.
Example: Public health experts warned about STI prevention.
Disproportionately (adverb) – affecting one group more than others.
Example: The tax may disproportionately affect low-income people.
Intrusive (adjective) – uncomfortably interfering in personal life.
Example: Some women described the policy approach as intrusive.
Fertility (noun) – the ability or rate of having children.
Example: The government hopes to raise fertility.
Trade-off (noun) – a balance between benefits and costs.
Example: Policymakers face a trade-off between tax rules and health risks.

Discussion Questions (About the Article)

What exactly is changing in China’s tax policy, and when does it begin?
Why are many people skeptical that a condom tax will increase birth rates?
What public health risks do experts connect to higher contraceptive costs?
Which statistics in the article (STIs, abortion estimates, or contraception usage) stood out to you most — and why?
How does the policy debate change when you consider gender roles in contraception?

Discussion Questions (About the Topic)

Should governments try to influence birth rates? If yes, what methods are acceptable?
How can a policy intended to solve one problem accidentally create another?
What policies would actually make young adults more willing to have children?
How should public health concerns be weighed against economic or demographic goals?
In your country, who is “responsible” for contraception in practice — and why?

Related Idiom

“Penny wise, pound foolish” – trying to save a small amount of money in a way that creates bigger problems later.

Example: If the tax increases STIs or unintended pregnancies, the policy could look penny wise, pound foolish.

📢 Want more news-based English practice like this? 👉 Sign up for the All About English Mastery Newsletter!
https://allaboutenglishmastery.com/newsletter

Want to finally master English but don’t have the time? Mastering English for Busy Professionals is the course for you! Check it out now!

Follow our YouTube Channel @All_About_English for more great insights and tips.

This article was inspired by: