Trump’s AI Executive Order Targets State Rules—And Businesses Are Watching

Intermediate | December 22, 2025

✨ 혼자서 기사를 소리 내어 읽거나 튜터를 따라 각 단락을 반복해서 읽으세요. 레벨...

Trump AI Executive Order: A New Federal Push Against State AI Laws

On December 11, 2025, President Donald Trump signed the Trump AI executive order, aimed at stopping states from enforcing certain artificial intelligence (AI) regulations. The order frames some state AI laws as obstacles to a national AI strategy—and it signals that the Justice Department could challenge those laws in court. (The Washington Post, White House)

Why This Matters: One Country, Many Rulebooks

Right now, the U.S. is drifting toward a patchwork system where each state creates its own AI rules. Tech companies say that’s a headache—especially if one state has strict compliance requirements while another has almost none. Trump’s argument is that a single national approach would protect U.S. competitiveness, including against China, and help AI companies innovate faster. (Reuters)

What the Order Actually Tries to Do

Coverage of the order says the administration wants federal agencies to challenge state AI laws it views as “blocking” national policy. It also raises the possibility of using federal funding as leverage—pressuring states to back off certain AI restrictions. Supporters say this prevents overregulation. Critics say it looks like federal overreach and could spark long legal fights. (Reuters, White House)

The Political Split (Even Inside the GOP)

This issue isn’t a simple left-versus-right debate. Some Republicans who usually defend states’ rights have raised concerns about blocking state action—especially on issues like discrimination, child safety, or job disruption. At the same time, many big tech players and industry groups prefer a national framework because it reduces compliance costs and uncertainty. (The Washington Post, PBS NewsHour)

The Business Angle: Uncertainty Is Expensive

For companies building AI tools, legal uncertainty created by the Trump AI executive order is a real cost. If states keep passing AI laws and the federal government keeps challenging them, businesses may hesitate to launch products, invest in certain markets, or hire teams—because they don’t know which rules will survive. Even if the goal is “one national standard,” the path there could get messy.

What Happens Next

The executive order points toward drafting federal legislation that could preempt (override) some state AI laws. But that would require Congress, and legal experts say the order itself may face hurdles. In the meantime, states and businesses are likely preparing for a new wave of lawsuits, lobbying, and policy negotiations in 2026. (Reuters, White House)

Vocabulary

Executive order (noun) – an official directive issued by a president.
Example: The executive order instructed agencies to challenge some state AI laws.
Regulation (noun) – a rule made by a government authority.
Example: Several states passed regulations focused on AI safety and fairness.
Patchwork (noun) – a messy mix of different systems or rules.
Example: Companies worry about a patchwork of state-by-state AI rules.
Compliance (noun) – following laws or rules.
Example: Compliance can be costly when rules differ across states.
Leverage (noun) – power used to influence decisions.
Example: Federal funding can be used as leverage against states.
Challenge (verb) – to question legally or formally.
Example: The Justice Department may challenge state AI laws in court.
Preempt (verb) – to override a lower-level law with a higher-level one.
Example: A federal law could preempt certain state regulations.
Competitiveness (noun) – ability to compete successfully.
Example: The administration framed the order as protecting U.S. competitiveness.
Overreach (noun) – going beyond proper limits of power.
Example: Some critics called the move federal overreach.
Uncertainty (noun) – lack of clear future direction.
Example: Policy uncertainty can slow business decisions and investment.

Discussion Questions (About the Article)

What is the main goal of Trump’s executive order on AI regulation?
Why do companies dislike a “patchwork” of state rules?
What parts of the order could create legal conflict?
Why are some Republicans divided on this issue?
How might uncertainty affect business investment in AI?

Discussion Questions (About the Topic)

Should AI rules be national, state-based, or a mix of both?
What AI risks do you think deserve regulation right now?
When does regulation protect people—and when does it slow progress?
Should governments use funding to pressure states? Why or why not?
If you ran an AI company, what kind of regulation would you want?

Related Idiom

“In the driver’s seat” – in control of a situation.

Example: The order is an attempt to put the federal government in the driver’s seat on AI policy.

📢 Want more news-based English practice like this? 👉 Sign up for the All About English Mastery Newsletter!
https://allaboutenglishmastery.com/newsletter

Want to finally master English but don’t have the time? Mastering English for Busy Professionals is the course for you!

Follow our YouTube Channel @All_About_English for more great insights and tips.

This article was inspired by: The Washington Post and supported by: Reuters, White House, and PBS NewsHour.