South Korea’s Judges Warn Against a Rush to Reform

Advanced | March 11, 2026

✨ Read the article aloud on your own or repeat each paragraph after your tutor.

Chief Judges Push for Caution, Not Chaos

A major debate is growing in South Korea over how far the country should go in changing its court system. On February 25, 2026, chief judges from courts across the country expressed “grave concern” about a package of judicial reform bills backed by the ruling Democratic Party. They said the proposals had moved forward without enough public discussion and could create serious side effects for the legal system and for ordinary citizens. (Yonhap)

What the Reform Bills Would Change

The reform package is not small potatoes. According to Yonhap, the bills would do three major things: create a new crime of “legal distortion,” allow constitutional appeals of court rulings, and expand the number of Supreme Court justices from 14 to 26. Critics say those changes could reshape the balance of power inside South Korea’s judiciary and create more uncertainty about how final court decisions really are. (Yonhap)

Judges Support a Smaller First Step

What makes this story especially interesting is that the judges did not reject every reform idea. Reporting from ChosunBiz and Seoul Economic Daily said many court chiefs agreed that the Supreme Court may need more justices. But instead of a sudden jump from 14 to 26, the majority view was to first add four justices, study the effect on trials, and then discuss whether further expansion makes sense. That is a much more careful approach than a fast political sprint. (ChosunBiz) (Seoul Economic Daily)

Why Judges Are Worried About Speed

The concern is not just about numbers. Judges warned that allowing constitutional appeals against court rulings could delay the final settlement of cases and effectively create a kind of fourth trial layer. Seoul Economic Daily reported that court presidents said repeated litigation could hurt citizens and create legal instability. In plain English, the judiciary is worried that a reform meant to improve justice could accidentally make justice slower, messier, and harder for the public to trust. (Seoul Economic Daily)

South Korea Judicial Reform Became a Political Fight

This issue quickly turned into a larger political battle. The Korea Times reported that the opposition People Power Party accused the ruling Democratic Party of pushing the bills too aggressively and trying to weaken judicial independence. The ruling party answered that the reforms would better protect people’s rights. Then, on March 1, the National Assembly passed the bill to increase the number of Supreme Court justices from 14 to 26, with the increase beginning in 2028. Under the current timetable, President Lee Jae Myung could appoint 22 of the 26 justices during his term. That is a big reason why the fight has become so heated. (The Korea Times) (The Korea Times) (KBS World)

Why This Story Matters

This story matters because courts depend on public trust, and trust is hard to rebuild once it is damaged. South Korea judicial reform may be necessary in some form, especially if the courts need more capacity. But when legal reform moves too quickly, people start to suspect that politics is steering the ship. The judges’ message was fairly clear: reform the system if needed, but do it carefully, openly, and in a way that does not create even bigger problems later.

Vocabulary

Judiciary (noun) – the system of courts and judges in a country.
Example: “The judiciary said the reform bills could have serious side effects.”
Plenary session (noun) – a full meeting of all members in a legislative body.
Example: “The bills were sent to a plenary session for a vote.”
Deliberation (noun) – careful discussion before making a decision.
Example: “The judges asked for more public deliberation.”
Constitutional appeal (noun) – a legal request asking a constitutional court to review a ruling or issue.
Example: “The proposed constitutional appeal system worried many judges.”
Judicial independence (noun phrase) – freedom for courts to make decisions without political pressure.
Example: “Critics said the bills could weaken judicial independence.”
Litigation (noun) – the process of taking legal action in court.
Example: “Repeated litigation could make the system slower and more confusing.”
Side effect (noun) – an additional result, often an unwanted one.
Example: “The judges warned of side effects from rushed reform.”
Incremental (adjective) – happening in small steps rather than all at once.
Example: “Adding four justices first would be a more incremental change.”
Overhaul (noun) – a major change or complete reform of a system.
Example: “Some judges said the court overhaul was moving too fast.”
Instability (noun) – a condition of uncertainty or lack of balance.
Example: “Legal instability can reduce public trust in the courts.”

Discussion Questions (About the Article)

What specific concerns did the chief judges raise about the reform bills?
What three main changes were included in the judicial reform package?
Why did many judges prefer adding four justices first instead of approving a bigger increase immediately?
Why are some people worried about constitutional appeals of court rulings?
Why did this legal debate become such a major political issue?

Discussion Questions (About the Topic)

Should judges play a public role in debates about judicial reform? Why or why not?
Is it better to reform a legal system slowly or quickly?
How important is judicial independence in a democracy?
Can legal reforms that aim to help citizens sometimes hurt them instead?
What happens when the public starts to see courts as political institutions?

Related Idiom

“Rock the boat” – to disturb a stable situation and create trouble.

Example: “Many chief judges seemed to be saying that reform is possible, but lawmakers should not rock the boat too hard or too fast.”

📢 Want more practical English using real news? 👉 Sign up for the All About English Mastery Newsletter! Click here to join us!

Want to finally Master English but don’t have the time? Mastering English for Busy Professionals is the course for you! Check it out now!

Follow our YouTube Channel @All_About_English for more great insights and tips.

This article was inspired by ChosunBiz, Yonhap, Seoul Economic Daily, The Korea Times, The Korea Times, and KBS World.