Trump Immigration Pause Targets ‘Third World Countries’

Advanced | December 7, 2025

✨ Read the article aloud on your own or repeat each paragraph after your tutor.

A New Trump Immigration Pause After the D.C. Shooting

The Trump immigration pause quickly rose to the center of national debate.

In late November 2025, President Donald Trump announced a new Trump immigration pause, saying it would apply to what he called “Third World Countries.” The announcement followed a deadly shooting near the White House, where an Afghan national shot two National Guard members. He had entered the United States through a humanitarian program in 2021. One soldier later died, and the tragedy immediately intensified political tension in Washington. (Reuters, ABC News Australia)

What Trump Actually Announced

On Thanksgiving, Trump posted on social media that his administration would “permanently pause migration from all Third World Countries” to “allow the U.S. system to fully recover.” He also pledged to end federal benefits and subsidies for noncitizens, cancel “millions” of immigration cases that he said President Biden had improperly approved, and remove anyone he considers “not a net asset” or “incapable of loving” the country. Outlets such as The Epoch Times and major international media reported and summarized these claims. (The Epoch Times, The Guardian)

Early Steps Toward a Trump Immigration Pause

Reviews and Application Freezes

Soon after the announcement, the Department of Homeland Security reviewed asylum and green card cases for nationals from 19 mostly non-European countries, including Afghanistan and Somalia. Officials also paused new immigration applications from those countries while the review proceeded. These early actions show how agencies began implementing parts of the Trump immigration pause even before Congress considered any new laws. (The Guardian, AP News)

Links to Expanded Travel Bans

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem later said she planned to expand the existing travel ban to more than 30 countries, far more than the 19 already under review. She argued that some governments cannot properly vet their citizens and that the United States should not accept migrants from states that fail to share security information. Critics countered that this expanded ban, combined with the Trump immigration pause, would sharply reduce both legal and humanitarian migration for years. (AP News, The Guardian)

Supporters vs. Critics

A Focus on Security

Supporters argue that the Trump immigration pause responds to failures in earlier vetting systems. They say officials should never have admitted the Afghan suspect in the D.C. shooting and claim that stricter controls will protect Americans and reduce pressure on public services. Some lawmakers want even broader pauses or permanent reductions to immigration levels.

Critics Warn of Discrimination and Overreach

Human rights organizations, immigration advocates, and several United Nations agencies strongly oppose the policy. They argue that blaming millions of migrants for one violent incident creates collective punishment and violates international asylum obligations. Groups such as Human Rights Watch say the policy reflects hostility toward certain nationalities and risks normalizing discriminatory language about “Third World” countries. (Human Rights Watch)

Practical Questions Still Unanswered

What Counts as a “Third World Country”?

The administration has not published an official list of which nations fall under the label “Third World Countries.” This vague, outdated term often appears in political rhetoric rather than technical classifications. Legal experts warn that this ambiguity will make the Trump immigration pause difficult to apply consistently and easy to challenge in court.

Impact on Businesses and Communities

Business leaders in industries that rely on foreign workers—technology, healthcare, and agriculture—say a broad, long-term Trump immigration pause will create hiring shortages and disrupt operations. Community organizations also warn that families already in the United States may face separation, fear, or even denaturalization if the administration follows through on its most extreme proposals.

For English learners, this story provides a clear example of how policy announcements, legal questions, and emotional language shape real-world news and professional communication.

Vocabulary

Pause (noun/verb) – a temporary stop or suspension.
Example (verb): “The president plans to pause immigration from certain countries.”
Vet (verb) – to carefully check someone’s background or information.
Example: “Officials say they must vet applicants more thoroughly.”
Humanitarian program (noun) – a system that allows people to enter a country for safety or relief.
Example: “The suspect arrived through a humanitarian program after the Taliban takeover.”
Subsidy (noun) – money or support given by a government to help pay for something.
Example: “Trump proposed ending federal subsidies for noncitizens.”
Denaturalize (verb) – to take away someone’s citizenship.
Example: “Some proposals would denaturalize people seen as security risks.”
Public charge (noun) – a person who is likely to depend on government support.
Example: “Officials may label some migrants a public charge and deny benefits.”
Collective punishment (noun) – punishing a whole group for the actions of one or a few.
Example: “Critics say the policy amounts to collective punishment.”
Asylum seeker (noun) – someone who asks for protection in another country because of danger at home.
Example: “Asylum seekers fear their cases will be frozen for years.”
Overreach (noun) – using more power than is fair or allowed.
Example: “Opponents call the plan a legal and moral overreach.”
Obligation (noun) – something a person or country is required to do, often by law or agreement.
Example: “The U.S. has international obligations toward refugees and migrants.”

Discussion Questions (About the Article)

What event appears to have triggered the Trump immigration pause announcement?
What specific actions did Trump say he would take regarding migrants and federal benefits?
How are immigration applications and asylum cases being affected in the short term?
Why do supporters believe the Trump immigration pause is necessary?
What concerns do critics and human rights groups raise about the policy?

Discussion Questions (About the Topic)

How should governments balance national security with their obligations to refugees and asylum seekers?
Do you think a broad immigration pause is an effective way to improve security? Why or why not?
What are the potential economic impacts of sharply reducing immigration from certain countries?
How does the language political leaders use—such as “Third World Countries”—shape public opinion?
In your view, what would a fair and transparent immigration system look like?

Related Idiom

“Throwing the baby out with the bathwater” – getting rid of something valuable while trying to remove something unwanted.

Example: “Critics say the Trump immigration pause is throwing the baby out with the bathwater by punishing all migrants for the crime of one individual.”

📢 Want more tips like this? 👉 Sign up for the All About English Mastery Newsletter! Click here to join us!

Want to finally master English but don’t have the time? Mastering English for Busy Professionals is the course for you!

Follow our YouTube Channel @All_About_English for more great insights and tips.

This article was inspired by: