Trump’s $10 Billion IRS Lawsuit: What’s Really Going On?

Advanced | February 27, 2026

✨ Read the article aloud on your own or repeat each paragraph after your tutor.

Trump Sues the IRS: The President vs. His Own Agencies

President Donald Trump (along with Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and the Trump Organization) has filed a lawsuit seeking at least $10 billion from the U.S. Treasury Department and the IRS. The case is tied to the unauthorized release of Trump-related tax return information to media outlets years earlier—meaning the lawsuit is about data privacy, not a new tax bill. In short: Trump sues the IRS over a leak, not over tax rates. (Reuters) (Reuters)

What Triggered the Case: A Contractor, a Leak, and Headlines

According to court reporting, Trump’s complaint says the agencies failed to take “mandatory precautions” to stop a former IRS contractor, Charles Littlejohn, from leaking protected tax information to the press. The lawsuit claims the disclosures caused “significant and irreparable harm” to reputation and financial interests, and it says the plaintiffs may seek punitive damages if the conduct is found to be willful or grossly negligent. (Reuters)

The reporting says the leaked information led to heavy coverage, including at least eight New York Times articles and at least 50 ProPublica articles based on the disclosures.

The Legal Strategy: “$1,000 Per View” Adds Up Fast

One of the most interesting parts is how the lawsuit gets to $10 billion. A legal analysis of the case says Trump is leaning on a theory tied to federal tax confidentiality laws—arguing that each time someone viewed the leaked information in a news story, it could count as a separate disclosure worth $1,000 in statutory damages. (Thomson Reuters Tax) Stack enough views together, and the number becomes enormous.

The lawsuit also argues the government should be liable even though Littlejohn was a contractor, claiming he functioned like a “joint employee” because the IRS allegedly exercised detailed day-to-day supervision over his work.

What We Know About Littlejohn (And Why It Matters)

Littlejohn was a government contractor linked to Booz Allen Hamilton. Reporting on his criminal case says he pleaded guilty to unauthorized disclosure of tax return information and was later sentenced to five years in prison. (AP News) The leaks involved Trump’s information as well as tax data connected to thousands of other wealthy Americans.

That bigger context matters because this isn’t just a “Trump story.” It’s also a story about whether the IRS can protect private taxpayer data—something that affects everyone. And when Trump sues the IRS, the spotlight gets even brighter on government data security.

The Pushback: Conflict-of-Interest Claims and Legal Roadblocks

A group of former government officials and public-interest organizations has challenged the lawsuit, warning it could become “collusive litigation”—basically, a situation where the President could influence both sides because the Justice Department defends the government and the IRS sits inside the executive branch. (Thomson Reuters Tax)

They also argue the case may be time-barred (filed too late) and aimed at the wrong defendant, and they say the $10 billion calculation is legally unsupported and unprecedented.

Why This Story Matters (Even If You Don’t Like Politics)

At the business level, this is about risk management: how a government agency handles sensitive data, what happens when security fails, and who pays the bill. If courts accept huge “per-view” damages theories, it could change incentives for how agencies settle cases—or how quickly companies and agencies tighten their controls.

And for regular people? It’s a reminder that privacy isn’t just a buzzword. Once private information is out, you can’t put it back in the file cabinet.

Vocabulary

Unauthorized (adjective) – not officially allowed or approved.
Example: The leak involved unauthorized access to protected taxpayer data.
Disclosure (noun) – the act of making information known.
Example: The lawsuit focuses on whether each disclosure created legal liability.
Statutory damages (noun) – money set by law as compensation, even without proving exact losses.
Example: The plaintiffs argue statutory damages could reach billions of dollars.
Punitive damages (noun) – extra money meant to punish wrongdoing.
Example: They say punitive damages may apply if the leak was willful.
Gross negligence (noun) – extreme carelessness.
Example: The complaint suggests gross negligence in handling sensitive files.
Time-barred (adjective) – blocked because it was filed after the legal deadline.
Example: Critics say the claim may be time-barred under a two-year limit.
Liable (adjective) – legally responsible for harm or damages.
Example: The lawsuit argues the government is liable for a contractor’s actions.
Joint employee (noun) – someone treated like an employee by more than one entity.
Example: The suit claims the contractor acted as a joint employee under IRS supervision.
Conflict of interest (noun) – when someone’s role could bias their decisions.
Example: Opponents argue the case creates a conflict of interest for the executive branch.
Collusive (adjective) – involving secret cooperation for an unfair advantage.
Example: An amicus brief warned about the risk of collusive litigation.

Discussion Questions (About the Article)

Who are the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, and who are they suing?
What does the complaint say the government failed to do?
How does the lawsuit try to justify such a large damages number?
What legal objections have been raised against the case?
Why might this lawsuit matter for government agencies beyond the IRS?

Discussion Questions (About the Topic)

Should governments face bigger penalties when they leak private data? Why or why not?
What should “reasonable safeguards” look like for highly sensitive information?
If a contractor causes harm, who should be responsible—the contractor, the agency, or both?
Do you think “per-view” damages make sense in the internet age? Why?
How can organizations balance transparency with privacy?

Related Idiom

“Opening a can of worms” – starting something that creates many new problems.

Example: If courts accept per-view damages, this case could open a can of worms for future privacy lawsuits.

📢 Want more practical English using real news? 👉 Sign up for the All About English Mastery Newsletter! Click here to join us!

Want to finally Master English but don’t have the time? Mastering English for Busy Professionals is the course for you! Check it out now!

Follow our YouTube Channel @All_About_English for more great insights and tips.

This article took inspiration from: The Epoch Times (topic seed), Reuters, Reuters (Treasury testimony), Thomson Reuters Tax, AP News, and the U.S. Senate Finance Committee (Ranking Member).