U.S.–Switzerland trade deal banner image featuring handshake symbolizing renewed business relations.

Swiss Business Delegation Opens Door to U.S.–Switzerland Trade Deal

Advanced | November 17, 2025

Read the article aloud on your own or repeat each paragraph after your tutor.


Swiss Corporate Diplomacy Meets Tariff Pressure in the U.S.–Switzerland Trade Deal

On November 5, 2025, top executives from major Swiss companies—including Rolex, Richemont, Partners Group, Mercuria and MKS PAMP—met with U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office to press for a resolution to the 39 % tariffs imposed on Swiss exports. (reuters.com)
The meeting was described as “highly constructive,” though no formal deal was signed at that time. It marked a key moment in the developing U.S.–Switzerland trade deal discussions. (reuters.com)


The Tariff Standoff and Business Backing

Switzerland faced tariffs of about 39 % on its goods exported to the U.S.—among the highest levels for any developed economy. (reuters.com)
Swiss business leaders pledged major U.S. investments, such as moving gold‑smelting operations and other manufacturing to the U.S., to help reduce the bilateral trade imbalance and advance the U.S.–Switzerland trade deal efforts. (reuters.com)


What’s Changing: Steps Toward the U.S.–Switzerland Trade Deal

The business delegation helped break months of deadlock. On November 9, 2025, a report indicated that Switzerland could be close to securing a deal to cut the U.S. tariffs to roughly 15 %, aligning with the rate the U.S. has assigned to EU goods. (reuters.com)
Meanwhile, negotiations continued into mid‑November, with Swiss officials and U.S. trade representatives describing talks as “very constructive.” (reuters.com)


Why It Matters for Business & Free Markets

  • For Swiss companies, lower tariffs would restore more competitive access to the U.S. market—especially for luxury goods, precision machinery, and pharmaceuticals. (reuters.com)
  • For the U.S., the U.S.–Switzerland trade deal represents leverage: by encouraging foreign firms to invest domestically and reduce trade imbalances, it reflects a market‑oriented approach to trade rather than broad protectionism.
  • From a libertarian viewpoint: This is a win for freer trade and corporate initiative stepping in where diplomacy stalled—a case of business leading and governments negotiating rather than government‐driven mandates.

Vocabulary

  1. Tariff (noun) – a tax on imports or exports.
    Example: “The U.S. imposed a 39 % tariff on Swiss goods.”
  2. Imposition (noun) – something forced upon others.
    Example: “The heavy tariffs were seen as an imposition on Swiss exporters.”
  3. Deadlock (noun) – a situation in which no progress is possible.
    Example: “Negotiations remained in deadlock before the business meeting.”
  4. Pledge (verb) – to promise solemnly.
    Example: “The Swiss firms pledged billions in U.S. investment.”
  5. Competitive (adjective) – able to offer the same or better value than others.
    Example: “Swiss exports must be competitive despite high tariffs.”
  6. Access (noun) – the opportunity to use or benefit from something.
    Example: “The deal would restore access to the U.S. market.”
  7. Leverage (noun) – power to influence a situation.
    Example: “Switzerland used its investment plans as leverage.”
  8. Alignment (noun) – a state of agreement or cooperation.
    Example: “Switzerland’s tariffs would be aligned with EU levels.”
  9. Imbalance (noun) – lack of equality or equilibrium.
    Example: “The trade imbalance was cited as a reason for the tariffs.”
  10. Constructive (adjective) – serving a useful purpose; helpful.
    Example: “Officials described the talks as very constructive.”

Discussion Questions (About the Article)

  1. Why did the Swiss business delegation meet with President Trump, and what did they present?
  2. How might the planned investment commitments from Swiss firms affect the U.S. trade deficit?
  3. What industries in Switzerland were most affected by the 39 % tariffs?
  4. What is notable about the change from 39 % to potentially 15 % tariffs?
  5. In what ways did private business initiative help move the negotiations forward?

Discussion Questions (About the Topic)

  1. Should business leaders play a larger role in international diplomacy and trade negotiations?
  2. How might reduced tariffs between countries benefit consumers and competition?
  3. From a free‐market viewpoint, what are the risks of high tariffs like those imposed on Swiss goods?
  4. What strategies can smaller trade nations like Switzerland use to influence larger economies?
  5. How do investment pledges and trade policy interact in a global economy with liberalized markets?

Related Idiom

“Break the ice” – to do or say something to relieve tension or get the conversation going.
Example: “The Swiss delegation’s meeting helped break the ice in long‑stalled trade talks.”


📢 Want more tips like this? 👉 Sign up for the All About English Mastery Newsletter! Click here to join us!


Want to Master English but don’t have the time? Mastering English for Busy Professionals is the course for you!


Follow our YouTube Channel @All_About_English for more insights.


This article was inspired by: Reuters (reuters.com)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

en_USEnglish
Scroll to Top